Every system we build for Australian allied health clinics meets all five of AHPRA's compliance principles — not as an afterthought, but as the foundation.
AHPRA published its framework for AI use by registered health practitioners. Generic AI consultants ignore it. We build every system against it from the first line of architecture.
A registered practitioner must remain accountable for all AI-assisted clinical decisions. The AI cannot be the responsible party — ever.
Practitioners must understand how any AI system they use reaches its outputs — not a black box.
Patients must be informed when AI is involved in their care. This is a mandatory disclosure requirement, not optional.
Patients must actively consent to AI use in their clinical care — separate from general treatment consent.
AI systems must comply with all relevant Australian laws and ethical codes — Privacy Act 1988, Australian Privacy Principles, My Health Record Act, NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission standards, and each profession's specific ethical code.
Most clinic owners don't know their current AI tool exposure. This is what we map in the free 30-minute audit.
| AI Tool / Use Case | AHPRA Risk | Primary Concern | Compliant with Implement AI? |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT / Claude (direct use) for clinical notes | HIGH | Data leaves Australian jurisdiction. No audit trail. No consent capture. | ✓ Yes — We rebuild with AU-hosted LLMs + audit trail |
| Generic transcription apps (Otter.ai, etc.) | HIGH | PHI stored on offshore servers. No AHPRA-specific compliance architecture. | ✓ Yes — We use AssemblyAI Medical Mode, AU-hosted |
| Cliniko / Halaxy built-in AI features | MED | Varies by feature. Some store data offshore. Consent may not be captured. | ✓ Yes — We audit and wrap with compliance layer |
| AI scribes (Heidi, Nabla, etc.) | MED | Data sovereignty varies. Accountability workflow may not meet AHPRA standard. | ✓ Yes — We build custom or integrate compliantly |
| NDIS report drafting (manual AI prompting) | MED | No structured sign-off workflow. Risk of practitioner not reviewing output. | ✓ Yes — Built-in review + sign-off workflow |
| Implement AI custom systems | LOW | Designed against all 5 AHPRA principles. AU data centre. Full audit trail. | ✓ By design |
Each allied health profession has different AHPRA obligations, documentation requirements, and workflow patterns. We build to each one specifically.
SOAP note automation, exercise plan generation, referral letters, Medicare billing, rebooking recall sequences.
Session note drafting, treatment plan documentation, GP mental health plan integration, appointment automation.
Assessment report drafting, NDIS progress notes, parent communication automation, telehealth workflow integration.
NDIS report automation, functional capacity assessment drafting, home modification report generation.
Clinical note automation, wound assessment documentation, diabetes management plan drafting, recall systems.
Progress note automation, service agreement generation, incident report drafting, plan review documentation, compliance audit trails.
Thirty minutes. No pitch. A written risk rating within 48 hours. That's the deal.
No preparation needed. Just book a time that suits you. We'll ask you to briefly describe your current AI tool use before the call.
On the call, Jeremiah maps every AI tool you're currently using or considering against AHPRA's five compliance principles. We identify specific gaps — not generic advice.
You receive a written AI Risk Rating — specific to your clinic, your tools, and your profession's AHPRA obligations. No obligation to proceed further.
30 minutes. Written risk rating within 48 hours. Genuinely no pitch.